New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(13956 previous messages)
rshow55
- 06:54am Sep 25, 2003 EST (#
13957 of 13958) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
lchic - 06:45am Sep 25, 2003 EST (# 13955
How do we measure 'better'?
In many senses ( the scientific senses are easier) a great
deal was sorted out on the question
How do we measure better?
by Percy Bridgman - the Nobel Prize winner and high
pressure engineering specialist.
Internal consistency is a vital standard and loop
tests - with both internal referncing - and references to
known standards - can do a lot. In fact - the most essential
advances in our scientific instruments are based on that.
For moral issues of what's better - internal
consistency also counts for a lot.
Yesterday morning - before a lot of fencing - I was
preparing stuff about Bridgman's work . . I'll get it ready in
a while.
lchic
- 07:17am Sep 25, 2003 EST (#
13958 of 13958) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
ON SCIENTIFIC METHOD
by Percy W. Bridgman (From: Reflections of a Physicist,
1955)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
To post a message, compose your text in the
box below, then click on Post My Message (below) to
send the message.
You cannot rewrite history, but you will have 30 minutes to
make any changes or fixes after you post a message. Just click
on the Edit button which follows your message after
you post it.
|