New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13855 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:10pm Sep 22, 2003 EST (# 13856 of 13875)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Cantabb - I've searched ALL your postings on this thread - you're referenced a few times by other posters - but your first posting is 13705 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/15398 - posted after I was away on a trip.

Why the sudden (and passionate and hostile) interest?

This was before your first posting - but I think for backgound - you might look at 13690 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/15383 and especially 13691-2 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/15384 - posted just a short time before your first posting.

You might also search "James Bond" and look at the associated story.

I've posted a lot in interaction with the other active posters - and have been paying more attention to their postings than to yours.

In 13853 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/15553

I posted a number of postings very specifically connected to missile defense. Did you look at them?

789-90 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/991

877 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/1116

1075 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/1368

1239-40 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/1582

1575-6 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/1582

1895-6 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/2367

2101 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/2605

4063-4 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/5117

5333 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/6688

5840-1 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/7267

6167 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/7645

9254 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/10780

12878 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/14554

What do you think of the procedure suggested? Is it, in your view, cheating ? If so, why so?

I'll be rereading every one of your postings - but I can't help wondering why the recent yet passionate ( and hostile ) interest.

Again, I recommend you look at 13691-2 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/15384 - posted just a short time before your first posting.

cantabb - 07:29pm Sep 22, 2003 EST (# 13857 of 13875)

rshow55 - 07:10pm Sep 22, 2003 EST (# 13859 of 13859)

Why the sudden (and passionate and hostile) interest?

I'll be rereading every one of your postings - but I can't help wondering why the recent yet passionate ( and hostile ) interest.

Asking you to focus "hostile" ?

What do you think of the procedure suggested? Is it, in your view, cheating ? If so, why so?

See if you CAN focus on the forum topic and post something coherent !

rshow55 - 07:38pm Sep 22, 2003 EST (# 13858 of 13875)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I posted a number of postings very specifically connected to missile defense. Did you look at them? ( See above. )

Again, I recommend you look at 13691-2 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.42TIbay2HeE.1251179@.f28e622/15384 - posted just a short time before your first posting.

More Messages Recent Messages (17 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense