New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(13673 previous messages)
wrcooper
- 11:49pm Sep 14, 2003 EST (#
13674 of 13680)
I doubt the words "I'm sorry" will ever actually get spoken
or written by Showalter. He's promised before to apologize to
people, or to answer their questions, but it takes him days to
think about it and try to come up with a way to express his
mea culpa and regrets. A simple "I'm sorry" is never up to
this boy's standards. Still, after all the pondering about how
best to say he's sorry, he somehow he never gets around to it.
Even when he's proven wrong, flat out falsified when he's
shown to have falsely accused somebody of being a liar--that
person being me--and after he promised to apologize, he
decides not to. Why? He's never said, exactly. He's just said
that after meeting me, he and his wife felt he didn't owe me
one.
Well, he does. And because he won't issue it, that makes
him a, you got it, liar, since he had told me he would. And he
damn well should.
I'm glad Bob's decided he doesn't much like me. Having Bob
dislike me is sort of like being knighted or something. It's a
badge of honor, coming from him. I'd have to worry about
myself if he did like me.That would indeed cause me to
seriously examine myself. Thankfully, this irresponsible
schmuck who has made a habit of accusing complete strangers of
being liars based on his silly paranoid musings, while
simultaneously preaching loudly and sanctimoniously to others
about how they should always "check" to be sure that facts
have been respected--the effrontery and hyprocrisy of the
man!--dislikes me. Phew! is all I can say.
I have a feeling that gisterme will not be spending
much time here anymore. I'm sure it's no fun for him with this
loudmouth plastering the board and calling him a liar. It's
annoying. I know.
Notice that there are never any newbies here, because I'm
sure they read two or three of Showalter's interminably
repeitious blatherings, and they never come back.
Well, I figure that the time's come to put old Bob on the
"Ignore List". Maybe mazza and gisterme will do the same, and
we can begin to discuss the issue of missile defense again,
simply ignoring the old boy, letting him stew in his thick
juice with no responses.
All you lurkers and newbies to the forum, don't give up.
Just put Rshow on your "Ignore List" in Preferences. Save
yourselves.
fredmoore
- 12:52am Sep 15, 2003 EST (#
13675 of 13680)
Perhaps the problem with NK is as simple as this story:
A chinaman went into the assay office with his morning
taking of gold. The clerk weighed it and gave him $300. He
went away happy. The next day he came back with exactly the
same amount and the clerk weighed it and gave him $250. When
the chinaman asked "why so little?" the clerk told him it was
fuctuations.
The next day the chinaman returned with the same amount
again and this time the clerk gave him $200. When the chinaman
again asked "why so little?" the clerk again replied ...
fluctuations! Well, the chinaman became irate and started
yelling and screaming .... "and Fluck you Americans too".
Sometimes things are easy and simple ... in ways that
really matter and in ways that may yield useful convergence by
those indomitable and connected courtroom standards. Beautiful
yet ugly ... sad but so. Eh Robert?
fredmoore
- 01:08am Sep 15, 2003 EST (#
13676 of 13680)
Will,
I wish you weren't so Maudlin ... this is after all a
forum.
PS1 I thoroughly enjoyed your French translation over at
the Space Forum. It would have taken me hours to brush up on
my French to be able to do that. Well done.
PS2 Could the French be trusted to organise such a Mars
collaboration? Could this be just a solar system Maginot Line?
The French are a worry sometimes! I wouldn't go so far as to
say they never learn but that is a concern. Mind you I do love
the language. I wonder how you would translate KAEP into
French? Protocol Energie Alternatif de Kyoto ... PEAK?
Cheers
patthnyc
- 02:44am Sep 15, 2003 EST (#
13677 of 13680) ". . . how fragile we are . . ." --
Sting
JERUSALEM: Israel has hinted at possible military action to
stop what it calls a nightmare scenario - nuclear weapons in
the hands of Iran - but for now is waiting for US diplomatic
pressure and closer international scrutiny to do the job.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_10-9-2003_pg4_12
Iran insists its nuclear programs are only for generating
electricity as oil supplies dwindle. It also has said its
equipment was “contaminated” with enriched uranium by a
previous owner.
But Israel estimates Iran is just two to three years away
from having nuclear weapons.
"Iran must cooperate fully. Iran has pledged not to develop
nuclear weapons and the entire international community must
hold that regime to its commitments," Bush recently said.
Iran apparently believes the attack could come from the
United States or Israel and announced it was increasing its
defence spending this year. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman
Hamid Reza Asefi recently warned Israel against embarking on
an "adventure" similar to the 1981 strike, saying "it will pay
dearly" if it does so.
The United States and Israel would most likely choose to
carry out pinpoint strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities,
rather than a large-scale assault if forced to take military
measures, said Ephraim Kam, a researcher with Tel Aviv
University's Jaffee Centre for Strategic Studies. Kam released
a study last week on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
For maps of oil pipelines PRESENT and ANTICIPATED, see:
http://www.fas.org/
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|