New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(13603 previous messages)
fredmoore
- 10:31am Sep 11, 2003 EST (#
13604 of 13606)
I like this poem. It reveals some truths in ways that
matter for action despite the headway being made:
He's a Cooper, makes barrels, with hoops and coops
and lengths of timber shaped in loops
and when he sees prolixity
he demands the facts, documential history
but here's the point
when with Johnson he's anoint'
he barrels his foe
with familial floe.
But will it trap
our undaunted chap?
It might but I don't think so.
So let's have a drink to the star of the show
Mr Robert Showalter who will post and post
till the barrel's full of Rpork and the stars no longer
Rglow.
FM2468
rshow55
- 11:46am Sep 11, 2003 EST (#
13605 of 13606) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
I feel like posting great pieces on altruism
http://www.mrshowalter.net/OfAltruismHeroismNEvolution'sGifts.htm
and especially
http://www.mrshowalter.net/UrgeToPunishCheatsNotJustHumanButSelfless.htm
Also a wonderful piece, In the Crowd's Frenzy - by
Natalie Angier - with a beautiful image. http://www.mrshowalter.net/IntheCrowd'sFrenzy.htm
People go "round and round" - but sometimes - though not so
often - sensible things converge.
How does that happen? I was assigned to try to find
out. It seemed an "impossible" task - but an important
enough task that Eisenhower and some people around him thought
it made sense to assign it to somebody - set him up so he had
as much of a chance to crack the problem as possible - and
make the exceptions that that took. I got fingered.
11721 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.tWS5b3UAEmI.8459891@.f28e622/13331
Sometimes procedures are set up where
exceptions are accomodated within a system. To circumvent a
chain of command is to break a body or rules -and in the
military these are compelling rules. Even so, I was told
that anyone anywhere under MacArthur's command with access
to a telephone or phone link was two phone calls away from
Douglas MacArthur during the last three years of MacArthur's
campaign against the Japanese in WWII. MacArthur was a
stickler for protocol - and for chains of command - and yet
he had a well organized system of exception handling.
11722 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.tWS5b3UAEmI.8459891@.f28e622/13332
AEA was an attempt to answer a number of questions. Here's
one:
. "How do you get radical change,
optimization, that can actually work in detail, when you
have to modify a very large complex system that is already
set up and running, involving many technical and
interpersonal committments already in place?"
" Casey worried about that question. So did the
Eisenhowers, Teller, many people who dealt with Kelly Johnson,
and many other senior people, including well connected
consultants like Edwin Land. They worried about some problems
involving the interface between math and engineering, as well.
And they had some specific problems, including missile
guidance. There were some other problems, as well . .
including some about nuclear stability and some about crypto .
. most of them both "obvious" and "deeply classified" -
depending how you look at it.
" Working on those problems, from 1967 on, I got
involved in some patterns that were definitely exceptional -
but that I thought, and others thought - served larger
purposes in a fully justifiable way. It was "outrageous" for
me to work on some of the problems I worked on. Or know about
them. All the same, if those problems were to be worked on -
given the people available - and some of the limitations and
complexities - "outrageous" things seemed sensible - and
downright conservative.
. . .
" I set out, in 1967 along a road where I assumed, and
had to assume, that when I needed government help - I could
get it. And find ways through channels, even when exceptions
had to be made.
- - - - -
Some exceptions have been made - and I think they've
been justified by accomplishments. I think Steve Kline would
have thought so - and both Eisenhowers - and I think Douglas
MacArthur would have approved, too. MacArthur would have been
appalled by Bush's inept and badly executed strategies. And
his excessive lying.
I don't feel like giving up. Hopeful things happen all the
time. Little kids need to learn to tie their shoes. Kids and
caretakers agree on this, by and large.
Should you teach kids to tie their
shoes "early" - or later?
Should you
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|