New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13596 previous messages)

almarst2003 - 10:29pm Sep 10, 2003 EST (# 13597 of 13603)

Friedman has won the Pulitzer three times, I think.

He can't be that bad, can he;)

fredmoore - 04:48am Sep 11, 2003 EST (# 13598 of 13603)

Invocation, incantation,

Lchic where art thou

whose sentence spells

a beauty untold

and a mind unfold

the secrets of an R..universe:

A French teacher was explaining to her class that in French, unlike English, nouns are designated as either masculine or feminine.

"House" is feminine - "la maison." "Pencil" is masculine - "le crayon."

A student asked, "What gender is a 'computer'?"

Instead of giving the answer, the teacher split the class into two

groups - male and female - and asked them to decide for themselves

whether "computer" should be a masculine or a feminine noun. Each group was asked to give four reasons for their recommendation.

The men's group decided that "computer" should definitely be of the feminine gender ("la computer"), because:

1. No one but their creator understands their internal logic;

2. The native language they use to communicate with other computers is incomprehensible to everyone else;

3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long-term memory for possible later review; and

4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find yourself spending half your salary on accessories for it.

> > >

The women's group, however, concluded that computers should be masculine ("le computer") because:

1. In order to do anything with them, you have to turn them on;

2. They have a lot of data but still can't think for themselves;

3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but half the time

they ARE the problem; and

4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if you had waited a little longer, you could have gotten a better model.

The women won!

  • ***********

    Lchic ... We love you!

    rshow55 - 08:29am Sep 11, 2003 EST (# 13599 of 13603)
    Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

    The poems Chain Breakers , Secular Redemption , and Learning to Stand http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee79f4e/662 have been used, again and again, on this board.

    Learning to Stand http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee79f4e/662 is a tribute to lchic , the most valuable mind I've ever encountered. We share hopes that C.P Snow and many others have expressed http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md4000s/md4125.htm

    We're working to make clearer, more practical, ideas of what hope looks like. Often, in a world where so much is hard to sort out - hope looks like a clear, sharp, condensation that fits - and guides our thoughts and feelings in sharp, useful, graceful ways. Lchic is superb at finding those condensations.

    Lchic and I talk most days. She asked that I post these poems here today.

    "Hope" is a thing with feathers.... by Emily Dickenson

    "Hope" is the thing with feathers

    That perches in the soul

    And sings the tune without the words

    And never stops at all,

    .

    .

    And sweetest in the gale is heard;

    And sore must be the storm

    That could abash the little bird

    That kept so many warm.

    I've heard it in the chillest land

    And on the strangest sea,

    Yet never, in extremity,

    It asked a crumb of me.

    . . . . .

    Dreams by Langston Hughes

    Hold fast to dreams

    For if dreams die

    Life is a broken-winged bird

    That cannot fly.

    .

    .

    Hold fast to dreams

    For when dreams go

    Life is a barren field

    Frozen with snow.

    Lchic's been building dreams - and grounding them - and spending a lot of time being a grand mother for a baby - who is growing, and sorting things out.

    She cares about what hope means - for that baby - and for all children.

    "What happens to the children?"

    is the question, I think, that she asks most often _ asks first - in everything she does.

    More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense