New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13581 previous messages)

rshow55 - 03:25pm Sep 9, 2003 EST (# 13582 of 13598)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

These links provide some background, about problems considered, and progress that's been made, and can be made.

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1011_1017.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1172.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2629.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2692.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5070.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5180.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5909.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md6000s/md6485.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9467.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9477.htm

6084 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUwVbOB7EHX.0@.f28e622/7559

8542 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUwVbOB7EHX.0@.f28e622/10068

13301 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUwVbOB7EHX.0@.f28e622/14987

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1011_1017.htm

rshowalter - 08:23am Mar 15, 2001 EST (#1016

. . . -- the most fundamental logical operator, I was taught by a very wise monster long ago, is not

. X implies Y and its opposite

but

. X is consistent with Y and it's opposite.

Put enough consistencies and inconsistencies together, in a tight structure, and you come as close to proof as human beings can come. This is standard procedure in court -- and now, for more than a decade, most of the evidence has been "hiding in plain sight."

-----------

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1172.htm

rshowalter - 11:09am Mar 19, 2001 EST (#1173

Under circumstances of much misunderstanding, and particularly in cases were deceptions may occur . . .

(i) What are the credible data from ALL sources?

ii) How can we formulate a model or solution that is consistent with all the credible data?

- - -

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2629.htm md2629-30

Findings of consistency, again and again, from many statistically and causally independent connections, can "nail something down." Our trial law practice is based on this, and in competently conducted jury trials it very often works.

But only if deceptions do not stump us.

That means that we must be prepared to consider deception, including the possibility of widespread deception, rather than defer to it.

- - - - - - - -

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5070.htm

A major source of credible information, though only one of many, is the output of THE NEW YORK TIMES.

More Messages Recent Messages (16 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense