New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13532 previous messages)

gisterme - 06:21pm Sep 5, 2003 EST (# 13533 of 13537)

Jorian -

I'm important in exactly the same way that every other human is important. There. How's that? :-)

As for the Viagra...ummm, thanfully, I'm not quite there yet. I mentally focus on the late Sen. Strom Thrumond as the example to follow to postpone needs in that department. If he could do it, surely I can too! ;-)

rshow55 - 07:22pm Sep 5, 2003 EST (# 13534 of 13537)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Assessing Watergate 30 Years Later By RICHARD REEVES http://www.mrshowalter.net/Assessing%20Watergate%2030%20Years%20Later.htm

http://www.mrshowalter.net/Sequential.htm

http://www.mrshowalter.net/PostsBy_Gisterme.htm

What I think isn't so important - and what anonymous posters think is only so important - but people can look for themselves - and some people are more important than others. If people with real power wanted to find out who gisterme is - they could.

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.uZ5Lb5qvDnj.0@.f28e622/15032

Stories start "once upon a time" - and involve context. How a Story Is shaped http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/ducksoup/555/storyshape.html

My story is a long story, in some ways - and it starts when a guy with some of the gentleness, sweetness, casualness, and trustfulness of Brig. Gen. Leslie R. Groves (but with more rank) scooped me up from an undergraduate program and made me into an "experimental animal" - or a soldier - or even an intellectual ( you can take your pick - the story works in a lot of ways ).

Eisenhower, like Groves, was "playing God." But this was six years after Eisenhower's FAREWELL ADDRESS of January 17, 1961 http://www.geocities.com/~newgeneration/ikefw.htm and Eisenhower had sense enough to be scared, and concerned, as he was "playing God." 13316-7 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.uZ5Lb5qvDnj.0@.f28e622/15004 includes this:

"Eisenhower and others thought that it was either likely, or certain, that the world would end unless some problems got solved. The Rand corporation was stumped.

Maybe gisterme doesn't like the story. But look around you.

The things Eisenhower warned against in his FAREWELL ADDRESS of January 17, 1961 http://www.geocities.com/~newgeneration/ikefw.htm have happened.

There are problems to fix. If some leaders of nation states actually asked who gisterme was - they could find out. And I think a lot of useful things might stem from that.

I think this board is working reasonably well.

Wish I was faster. Some notions fredmoore raised about human lasers are interesting. I want to respond in ways that are useful - and lead to stability - not things blowing up.

But I don't want to move too fast. I notice that gisterme does respond to the board - sometimes pretty quickly, considering.

Gisterme denies that he wants people to think he's a powerful personage. People can click http://www.mrshowalter.net/PostsBy_Gisterme.htm - look at the links, and judge for themselves.

There's a lot on http://www.mrshowalter.net/ - including http://www.mrshowalter.net/CoreStory.html - I wonder what the founding fathers would have thought about the possibility of that "story" being put out - and (looking at the odds) plainly read by journalists and government types - yet not checked .

I think they'd be amazed. And ashamed.

There are problems to fix - and a lot of them would be easier to fix if leaders insisted on finding out who gisterme is.

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense