New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(13427 previous messages)
rshow55
- 07:14pm Aug 26, 2003 EST (#
13428 of 13430) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Jorian319 has a point - and though I often agree
with you, Almarst , and even though Jorian319
may miss your points - it might be better if you see some of
his. The collective interest is important - and people
often miss it. But individual hard work and concerted
effort are important, too.
That doesn't devalue much that you say.
But Americans do get a lot of good things done - and
many earn their life style. Neither ignorance nor
laziness brought that about. Nor is exploitation much of the
explanation, either.
Rage has its uses - but it is only so useful. Hard work
matters.
Almarst , you sometimes make the point that hard
work, to pay off, has to occur in a framework of ideas and
human institutions that permit the work to pay off. That's
important, but not the whole story.
There are some problems that require collective
decisions - and I've been involved with problems like that.
Everything Eisenhower wanted me to do - the "Robert Showalter"
problems - were like that.
The technical jobs weren't insurmountable (for example, the
optimal design jobs done at AEA were straightforward) but
every one of them required, and continues to require - some
help from a nation state http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUK1bmZ8Bov.0@.f28e622/14942
The solar energy project set out (with some responses to
comments by you and gisterme ) is an example of just
that situation. And getting that project implemented would be
worth more to the US national security than anything that can
possibly happen in Iraq.
13039 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUK1bmZ8Bov.0@.f28e622/14716
13040 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUK1bmZ8Bov.0@.f28e622/14717
13041 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUK1bmZ8Bov.0@.f28e622/14718
13042 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.iUK1bmZ8Bov.0@.f28e622/14719
Large scale jobs of that kind have an important role to
play. I've been preoccupied by such things.
But almarst , you've been functioning, in large
part, as a Russian stand-in - and most of the problems
that Russia has, and has had for a long time - involve
inadequacies in areas where the "rugged individualism" of
Americans works well.
Rage isn't enough for you to adress the problems that you
need to - as much as I admire a great deal that you say.
fredmoore
- 06:01am Aug 27, 2003 EST (#
13429 of 13430)
Lou,
Nice joke. You really told that to your class?
In keeping with the maxim "always return a joke told", I
offer the following:
Rshow the butler was summoned by the Lord of the Manor (aka
you know who).
"Rshow, the Vicar is coming for tea, would you go down to
the village and buy a bottle of whisky, a box of cigars, and
two ounces of snuff"
It was a long walk to the village and when halfway back,
Rshow realised that he had forgotten the snuff, It was too far
to walk back to the village so he decided to improvise. He
found three dog turds and crushed then into a powder. When he
returned to the manor, the Master checked the purchases.
"Do you smell dog turds Rshow?"
"No my Lord, I can't say that I do."
Then the Vicar arrived. and immediately got stuck into the
scotch.
"Can you smell dog turd Vicar?", asked the Lord.
"Can't say I can, old chap", replied the Vicar, "but then,
I do happen to have a heavy cold."
"In that case have some snuff", said the Lord.
The Vicar reached out and took a sniff up each nostril.
"By Jove!", said the Vicar, "You do get the best snuff.
That's cleared my head completely ..... I can smell the dog
sh$t now."
*****
Let us know what the class thinks of that one Lou!
almarst2002
- 08:10am Aug 27, 2003 EST (#
13430 of 13430)
former weapons inspector Richard Butler says the US
administration believes it can operate outside the rules when
it comes to weapons of mass destruction because it is the
world's only superpower. - http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s932149.htm
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
To post a message, compose your text in the
box below, then click on Post My Message (below) to
send the message.
You cannot rewrite history, but you will have 30 minutes to
make any changes or fixes after you post a message. Just click
on the Edit button which follows your message after
you post it.
|