New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13041 previous messages)

rshow55 - 12:03pm Jul 17, 2003 EST (# 13042 of 13047)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Postings on large scale solar energy in recent weeks on this thread:

12220 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/13858

12222 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/13860

12223 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/13861

12357 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14007

12717-18 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14385

12737 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14405

I've been talking about large scale solutions to problems - problems that might be thought of as "Eisenhower scale" - for a long time.

gisterme - 03:06am Jun 30, 2003 EST (# 12749 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14420

12735 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14405

lchic - 08:40am Jun 30, 2003 EST (# 12755 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14426

12759 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14430

12762 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14433

12763 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14434

12764 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14435

12765-66 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14436

12767 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14438

12768 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14439

12770 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14441

Optimization is "doing the best you can." It takes some work to find out what "the best you can" is: 12759 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14430

gisterme - 11:36pm Jun 30, 2003 EST (# 12773 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14444

12774 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14445

12775 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14446

Movie people have a lot of influence - and a lot of sophistication. Last year, I wrote this: 1228 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/1572

gisterme - 12:58am Jul 1, 2003 EST (# 12776 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14447

lchic - 03:06am Jul 1, 2003 EST (# 12778 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14449

Global warming:

12804 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14475

12806 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14477

12808 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14479

12855 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14526

12874 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14550

12875 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14551

12937 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14613

12939 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14615

12940 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14616

12966 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14642

Stages have different costs. If a permanent solution to the world energy problem was pretty certain after a few hundred thousand bucks, nearly certain after a million or two - and very certain at all technical levels after a billion dollars was spent - but then required a very large investment (fully amortized in a few years) would it be worth doing? And actually doable?

We're spending a billion dollars a week in Iraq.

I've also been worrying about organizational issues involved with this sort of proposal, including some things where I feel I need some permissions. 12855 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.LmCQb8K4rS2.0@.f28e622/14526

If I'm moving slowly on getting those permissions - it is partly because I'm afraid - for the same reasons other vulnerable people are afraid. (And we're all vulnerable.)

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense