New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(12910 previous messages)
rshow55
- 10:08am Jul 9, 2003 EST (#
12911 of 12914) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
6283-6286 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.j8LLboIonIO.54927@.f28e622/7785
sets out Of Altruism, Heroism and Evolution's Gifts in the
Face of Terror By NATALIE ANGIER http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/18/health/psychology/18ALTR.html
is well summarized by this link. Her piece begins:
"For the wordless, formless, expectant
citizens of tomorrow, here are some postcards of all that
matters today:
"Today" was a time of mourning - a few days after the WTC
came down.
I posted the whole article, as part of discussions then
ongoing with gisterme and others right after the
tragedy-crime of Sept 11, in
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9299.htm
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9300.htm
. . .
I continue ( see http://www.mrshowalter.net/calendar1.htm
. . 6286 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.j8LLboIonIO.54927@.f28e622/7788
) . . How, as a matter of mechanics , can it be "
possible to widen the moral circle" . . to shift "the
boundary between us and them" in workable ways that permit
more "win-win" situations, and less horror?
. How can "widening the moral circle" be
done, consistently enough, predictably enough, on the
personal levels where it has to happen, so that the widening
works on a worldwide scale?
We need to know right from wrong in a number of
senses. The NASA mess illustrates a number of things that go
very wrong. Some key problems deal with repression - others
with "the crowd's fury" in the face of differences -
and some problems deal with basic facts about power relations
in our species.
rshow55
- 10:16am Jul 9, 2003 EST (#
12912 of 12914) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
In Blair We Trust By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/08/opinion/08KRIS.html
Tony Blair dignifies his opponents by
grappling with their arguments in a way that helps preserve
civility — and that we Americans can learn from.
389 http://politicstalk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7a163/422
390 http://politicstalk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7a163/423
391 http://politicstalk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7a163/424
393 http://politicstalk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7a163/426
10068 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.j8LLboIonIO.54927@.f28e622/11613
includes a long, important quote from Adolf Berle's
Power .
There are basic limitations to human power relations
- and unless we understand them - we can be confident
of things that are disastrously wrong.
Lchic's "Condi lines up the dots" deals with
key problems http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/1239
Trust has to be limited, care has to be taken, when
judgements and decisions are being made.
Of judged.
rshow55
- 10:23am Jul 9, 2003 EST (#
12913 of 12914) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Trust has to be limited, care has to be taken, when
judgements and decisions are being made.
Or judged.
Bush Tries to Deflect Criticism of Prewar Intelligence
on Iraq By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 6:39 a.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Bush-Iraq.html
When asked about his prewar statement on
Iraq that the White House now says was flawed, the president
said he was "absolutely confident" in his actions.
I believe President Bush when he says that he was
"absolutely confident." - but it is possible to be
absolutely confident and yet absolutely
wrong.
President Bush shows how possible that is - by his actions
and stances, much too often. It is dangerous. And, after
enough repetitions - he ought to be ashamed of himself - and
the American people ought to be ashamed of him, and for him.
As some NASA people should be ashamed.
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|