New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(12864 previous messages)
rshow55
- 03:27pm Jul 6, 2003 EST (#
12865 of 12879) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
More on Osprey:
7491 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7487.htm
7618-9 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7618.htm
7897 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7893.htm
Osprey - forged maintenance logs. And, to
its credit - the Marine Corps did respond.
7909 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7909.htm
At the same time, US institutions, including
the United States Marine Corps as it deals with the Osprey
matter, are showing how good the United States can
be, and offering both good examples, and hope.
7914-6 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7914.htm
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7916.htm
In the Osprey records falsification case,
The United States Marine Corps has responded in what appears
to be an exemplary fashion to such challenges. People are
being held responsible, and a broad, careful investigation
is being done.
. . . If the Marine Corps can stand up to
unpleasant circumstances in the Osprey case, as it seems to
be doing, key technical problems in the missile defense
program may be adressable, too.
8071-3 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8069.htm
8076-7 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8275.htm
8338-9 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8338.htm
8623 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8623.htm
9284 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9281.htm
9986 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9981.htm
9988-94 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md9000s/md9988.htm
11180 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md11000s/md11175.htm
11183-8 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md11000s/md11183.htm
Sometimes "the system" cleans up itself, to
some degree.
. Eight Marine Officers Are Charged in
Osprey False-Records Case by CHRISTOPHER MARQUIS http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/18/national/18OSPR.html
1317 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.FELAbu6FnEp.744045@.f28e622/1675
8647 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.FELAbu6FnEp.744045@.f28e622/10174
8794 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.FELAbu6FnEp.744045@.f28e622/10321
8801 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.FELAbu6FnEp.744045@.f28e622/10328
9976 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.FELAbu6FnEp.744045@.f28e622/11522
Now that there's A Final Push for the Bedeviled, Beloved
Osprey By LESLIE WAYNE http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/06/business/06CHOP.html
- responsible legislators - who often fight for sums much
smaller than the 48 billion dollars involved here - ought to
look carefully at what's involved here.
There are some tough, honest, capable people involved with
the Osprey program. It seems likely that the Marines
have been watching the contractors involved closely -
and watching their own test programs closely. Some very tough
tactical and strategic judgements are involved.
If the United States needs this capability - at b this
price - ( more than 12 billion has been spent - and 458
Ospreys will cost 48 billion ) then we ought to think and
work hard to find ways to make it less
precarious.
(14 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|