New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12455 previous messages)

almarst2002 - 09:49pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (# 12456 of 12474)

Blix: I was smeared by the Pentagon Hans Blix, the UN chief weapons inspector, lashed out last night at the "bastards" who have tried to undermine him throughout the three years he has held his high-profile post. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,974998,00.html

In its annual report published yesterday, the committee criticises the way February's "dodgy dossier" on Iraq - compiled by the staff of Mr Blair's communications chief, Alastair Campbell, and containing material plagiarised from other sources - was published without MI6 clearance. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,974834,00.html

almarst2002 - 10:02pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (# 12457 of 12474)

Few Arabs dispute that, so far, the Americans have done badly - so badly that, in the view of Abdul Bari Atwan, editor of the pan-Arab newspaper al-Quds al-Arabi, they risk provoking a "national awakening and war of attrition that make Vietnam seem like a picnic in comparison". - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,974779,00.html

almarst2002 - 10:04pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (# 12458 of 12474)

After the war US presence comes under fierce attack - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,972483,00.html

bbbuck - 10:11pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (# 12459 of 12474)

A nuclear bomb has just been detonated in krakatoa.

http://that's-not-the-sun-that's-a-fcking-nuclear-megaton-bumm.com/

fredmoore - 10:17pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (# 12460 of 12474)

Buck ...

Yes, the article says that the nearby hamlet of Krakatoeberg had to be evacuated. It was Robbed, looted and totally abandoned.

almarst2002 - 11:18pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (# 12461 of 12474)

Iraq put up a surprisingly heroic resistance against the Anglo-American invasion. The outcome was never in doubt. On the one side an oil rich country of 24 million people, ruled by an autocrat, debilitated by 12 years of sanctions and bombing. On the other side, history's most powerful military machine, directed by former oil executives. Cowards love a mismatch. http://www.freespeech.org/fsitv/fscm2/genx.php?name=home

More Messages Recent Messages (13 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense