New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(12446 previous messages)
almarst2002
- 10:21am Jun 10, 2003 EST (#
12447 of 12474)
ISLAMABAD: Five people, including four children, have
died in eastern Afghanistan from an aerial spray
apparently used to destroy opium poppies, the Afghan Islamic
Press (AIP) quoted a farmer as saying on Friday. - http://jang.com.pk/thenews/may2003-daily/10-05-2003/main/main19.htm
The TALLIBAN eradicated the OPIUM farming in Afganistan
using very "barbaric" methods of punishment, widely criticized
by a "civilized" West.
US eradicated TALLIBAN in a typical Western "civilized"
manner and opened the way for the OPIUM industry - now the
LARGEST in a World.
Now US is trying to eradicate OPIUM, again in a very
"civilized" Western way.
VIVA LA MODERNITY!
rshow55
- 10:29am Jun 10, 2003 EST (#
12448 of 12474) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Judged by WHOM?
COMMON GOOD by WHAT CRITERIA?
Who will COUNT RESULTS and BE ACCOUNTABLE?
are extremely important comments.
Current behavior by the Bush administration is, too often,
outrageous , a work Krugman used today.
outrageous:
dictionary: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary?define=outrageous&Submit1=Search
thesaurus: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/thesaurus?thesaurit=outrageous&Submit1=Search
Issues of right and wrong - including issues of
propriety are very important. I think it is fair to say
that I have thought a good deal about them, but thought from
an unconventional perspective, because at the age of 18 I was
commandeered by a retired Army General and former
president of the United States.
It seems to me that things are getting enough clearer than
usual - enough more polarized than usual - so that there is a
good chance now to make some advances. For that to happen,
some matters of status have to be discussed.
Speaking for myself, I think we should be proud to
have Almarst post here.
fredmoore
- 01:49pm Jun 10, 2003 EST (#
12449 of 12474)
Robert/Almarst,
If you really want something to worry about, read the
following:
Is regulation of nanotech a good idea? If so, what form
could it take? Can we have "some" regulation of nanotech?
http://nanodot.org/article.pl?sid=01/02/14/0132244
Fascinating!
(25 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|