New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12032 previous messages)

almarst2002 - 07:49am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12033 of 12046)

War, oligarchy and the political lie - http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/may2003/war-m07.shtml

"the war against Iraq was justified by the US government on the basis of lies, and that, when these lies are clearly exposed, the response of the American media is one of dismissive indifference, a big “So what.”

rshow55 - 07:50am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12034 of 12046)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

There are some similarities - but some significant distinctions between the US and Nazi germany - and between the "barbarism" under US command in WWII and that of Germany.

Eisenhower embodied both the toughness (and he knowingly killed a lot of people, many innocent) and the desire to do better than war.

We're back, now, to some of the same problems the world faced in 1952. With these differences. We know a great deal more - and power balances are very different.

With some losses, too. US administration is nothing like as honest and sophisticated as it was in 1952 - and that's a problem.

I feel sure of this. Moral indignation is of limited use.

rshow55 - 07:51am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12035 of 12046)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Eisenhower worked his ass off for disarmament - and to find ways to make the United Nations work.

At the same time he was the most sophisticated, ruthless, and able military leader the US ever had.

I see no contradiction.

almarst2002 - 07:54am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12036 of 12046)

"Moral indignation is of limited use."

As is the wall thermometr against winter cold.

almarst2002 - 07:55am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12037 of 12046)

"I see no contradiction."

Nor see all the consequential dead bodies.

The ultimate PEACE.

rshow55 - 07:57am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12038 of 12046)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

So far, body counts are low. That's progress.

With work - we can make more progress. In terms of the real practical and emotional needs that people actually have.

Without asking anybody to do anything they can't actually do.

Indignation does have some uses - but it can cause paralysis.

I'm doing the best I can - and know that you are - but we ought to be able to sort things out better.

rshow55 - 08:00am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12039 of 12046)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I'm only so sweet and gentle.

I'd willingly, personally, shoot every supporter of Al Queda I could get my hands on - given "executive priviledge" to do so.

But the amount of effort I've put into peacemaking _ and that gisterme's put into peacemaking - is substantial, too.

And if things I knew were actually used - we'd live in a much safer, more prosperous world - a world where your interests and needs would be much better served than today.

almarst2002 - 08:02am May 26, 2003 EST (# 12040 of 12046)

Pentagon’s top 50 list - http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins2002/Top50-1.htm

11th proudly stays CARLYLE GROUP

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense