New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(11187 previous messages)
rshow55
- 12:33pm Apr 7, 2003 EST (#
11188 of 11192)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
If we figured out just a little bit more than we know, and
if we were just a little bit more honest -- we could survive -
and the world would be much better.
If the following simple rhyme became a "nursery rhyme" -
learned by 4 year olds and their parents -- the world would
become a lot better. The rhyme has a lot to do with
"connecting the dots" - and the fact that people, good as they
are, aren't perfect.
Adults need secrets, lies and fictions
To live within their contradictions.
. . . . But when things go wrong
. . . . And knock about
. . . . Folks get together
. . . . And work it out.
We can work things out because there are many
repeating patterns. Some of the most basic of these are
illustrated by the mathematical notion of fractals. I believe
that there are some basic - and precisely self-similar
patterns of connection in brains, and believe I know something
about some basic ones.
Wheter or not that's true, there are patterns of order that
have some analogies to fractals.
Some similarities are exact in defined ways. The patterns
of order are useful - and operationally real.
The organization of human logic and language is "fractal
like" in some ways and not in others.
http://math.rice.edu/~lanius/frac
http://math.rice.edu/~lanius/fractals
The correspondences are operationally real and
useful. The distinctions and differences are
operationally real and useful, too.
Patterns of seeing organize themselves into systems of
patterns - and some of these patterns are sometimes called
"paradigms" . The notion is general, and somewhat
diffuse - but it is useful - and it would be useful if the
idea was sharper than it has been. Lchic and I have been
working on that sharpening.
#116 - http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.wH81aKL76oC.897263@.f28e622/137
gives key reference to the Riley-Showalter paradigm thread,
Paradigm Shift .... whose getting there? ...
Dawn Riley (Lchic) and I have been at the notion of
"paradigm" a long time. That hasn't been accidental. Though
there have been some serendipitious things about the work.
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|