New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10162 previous messages)

mazza9 - 12:55pm Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10163 of 10168)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Gisterme:

The rationale for the inspections was that the Iraqi were so precise in their record keeping that compliance could be verified by a bunch of clerks!

If that's the case, if records are not destroyed the Iraqi people will, in all likelyhood, find the proof of "Saddam's inhumanity to man!"

I will be interested to hear the excuses and babble from the Peacenik movement and who support this villian. As for France...Mark Twain nailed it, didn't he?

almarst2003 - 01:16pm Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10164 of 10168)

Saddam's inhumanity and foolishness was known quite a while ago to those who cared to look and understand. But not that long ago to forget a "special" relationship at that time between Saddam and the West, particularely with US.

One can also be sure there will be no "excuses and babble" from the "saint wariors" if thing will turn out badly.

As for Mark Twain... he nailed a couple of other things beside France.

lchic - 01:54pm Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10165 of 10168)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Potatoes have trippled in price in Baghdad, and plastic bags - to hold water are sold out.

Maslow base line realities -- as pre-war panic sets in.

______________________

Propaganda war underway in Gulf - The World Today - Friday, 14 March , 2003

    AGNES CUSACK: The United States admits to just one so-called "psychological operation in wartime". Commando Solo. That's eight aircraft from the 193rd Special Operations Wing beaming radio and television programs from a high altitude.
    Public Affairs Officer, First Lieutenant, Edward Shank.
    EDWARD SHANK: Commando Solo is the world's only airborne radio and television broadcasting station. We fly over an area where we broadcast information to the people, in this case to the people of Iraq.
_____________________

Iraqi Kurdistan - War Within A War [transcript]

    DR BARHAM SALIH: This is the guy (Saddam) who in the space of six months rounded up 182,000 people, never to be heard from again. He is a tyrant, he is a dictator, he is an evil man.
    OSMAN HAMASALIH AHMED: If Saddam goes to court, he will be hanged by my hand here because of what he has done.
    HARDAKER: When you hear the stories of the Kurds who live here, you can understand why they can't wait to get rid of Saddam Hussein. But what price freedom? Thousands of Kurds could be killed if Saddam Hussein launched a chemical attack over here. Already in those hills, he's got artillery positions established overlooking this area. And then there's the United States, the great liberator. They've already betrayed the Kurds in the past and the fear is they might do it again.
    http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/stories/s810003.htm
______________________

His (Saddam's) family's control has been so dictatorial that there are no real political institutions that might take over the running of the state if he were deposed. What could follow is a chaotic power vacuum.

Iraq has no serious internal opposition, and there are doubts about the various organisations that have set themselves as opposition groups in exile - some are badly run and disunited, others have no popular support in Iraq at all.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1879841.stm

Saddam - bbc - index

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/search/results.pl?q=after+saddam&tab=allbbc&go=homepage&x=14&y=19

______________________

Human Shields http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/

______________________

France - Iraq (bbc index)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/search/results.pl?q=france+iraq&tab=allbbc&go=homepage&x=35&y=8

______________________

lchic - 02:01pm Mar 18, 2003 EST (# 10166 of 10168)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Reviews by program makers of the Iraq situation

* show the 'hell' the Kurds have been through - even now preparing incase of 'more' chemical attacks. Fearing that Turkey will come down on them and re-start old scraps.

* show the wheelings and dealings happening over OIL

* show the need for intervention on humanitarian grounds - in the earliest stages of internal-nation-state crisis

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Forums FAQ | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us