New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10015 previous messages)
rshow55
- 10:34pm Mar 15, 2003 EST (#
10016 of 10027)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
almarst2003 - 09:00pm Mar 13, 2003 EST (# 9903 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.v0LPasDF5Qs.2115032@.f28e622/11447
speaks of key issues:
" Control of Oil and impact on a World
wide economy, Iraqi's geo-strategic and demographic
potential, credibility of Bush and his Administration,
future of Blair's Administration, future of UN, NATO and
international law, relationship between US, Britain and
"old"-Europe+Russia, degree of antiAmerican anti-Western
radicalization of Arab and Muslim nations (1,5 bn in total
as I think), Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolution."
All vitally important - big scale issues.
The physical existence of Saddam (or a hidden
fraud-conspiracy) is also important - at a smaller
scale level - because it is relevant to interpreting what has
happened - what opportunities are - what risks are - and how
Iraq can be expected to respond to statements and actions.
out.
rshow55
- 10:44pm Mar 15, 2003 EST (#
10017 of 10027)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Almarst , until leaders with real power - use
- that power to see to it that key facts get checked to
closure - there's no way to deal with some absolutely key
problems. Since I've been begging for that on this board for
almost three years now, without success, it may be too much to
hope for (though sometimes ideas eventually do take hold.)
For certain kinds of power to be challenged - facts
have to be established persuasively. These references include
my personal favorite limerick - and important insights from
almarst .
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2547.htm
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md3000s/md3869.htm
http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md11000s/md11902.htm
When things are complicated, truth is our only hope: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/296
gisterme
- 10:46pm Mar 15, 2003 EST (#
10018 of 10027)
rshow55 - 10:24pm Mar 15, 2003 EST (# 10014 of ...)
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.v0LPasDF5Qs.2115032@.f28e622/11559
"...I have to assume from 10007 that gisterme probably
assumes that Saddam is dead - as I think most people will who
look at it..."
I assume no such thing. As cleary said in the post you
referenced, I'm certain that Saddam is alive and up to his
usual cruelty and deception. Nobody that doesn't have their
head stuck firmly in the sand (or someplace worse) could reach
any other conclusion from this post:
gisterme - 06:33pm Mar 15, 2003 EST (# 10007 of ...)
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.v0LPasDF5Qs.2115032@.f28e622/11559
.
Quit trying to overcomplecate the obvious, Robert, and
especially don't try to put words in my mouth. I'm
quite able to speak for myself, thank you.
If you think Saddam is dead, well good for you. So
far as I know, you're the only person on the planet that
thinks so. You have a right to your opinion and a right to
express it; but just because you think and say a thing
doesn't make it so.
I'll believe Saddam is dead when I see his head on a stick.
Frankly, I think he's too much of a coward to let that happen.
He'll probably run for the Hague before he lets himself get
the Mussolini treatment at the hands of his own people...if he
has any choice in the matter. Whatever happens, Saddam will
likely be found cowering under the table.
rshow55
- 10:48pm Mar 15, 2003 EST (#
10019 of 10027)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
You should be ashamed of yourself. And you should check
your facts.
If you were working to do everything possible to alienate
the bulk of the world from the United States - you could
hardly do a more effective job.
I think Krugman's got your number.
(8 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|