New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(555 previous messages)
mazza9
- 10:49pm Mar 14, 2002 EST (#556
of 574) Louis Mazza
Well actually, the most recent Shadow was Alec Baldwin! The radio
series was fun to listen to as well.
LouMazza
lchic
- 11:08pm Mar 14, 2002 EST (#557
of 574)
Diversion diversion diversion Diversion
Must have been some really good points on the board prior to the
mAzzA ... take the heat off us .. postings ...!
mAzzA it's a world board -- much of your local culture is just
that 'local' .. with neither export quality, interest nor appeal!
The matters that are of international interest you make no
contribution to - so why here ... ah yes .. you're told!
mazza9
- 11:08pm Mar 14, 2002 EST (#558
of 574) Louis Mazza
Hey, RShow55! Check this out. It appears that your balloons will
be flying durng this missile defense test. Who knows???
Missile
Test
LouMazza
mazza9
- 11:11pm Mar 14, 2002 EST (#559
of 574) Louis Mazza
lchic:
I don't know where you reside but here in the United States we
have this little thing called "Freedom of Speech". If you don't like
it then when your king of the world you can kill all of us who you
would prefer to shut up! Until then you can write your little poems
and bore us!
LouMazza
lchic
- 12:37am Mar 15, 2002 EST (#560
of 574)
The EU are putting a progress plan in place .... sorry USA ....
looks like they're out to be the First Economy -- watch out for the
2010 visionary projection.
"Good Sir, i'll NEVER EVER be
king of the world .. Knowing you wouldn't
settle for less adjusting my crown .... bid me Queen
... or .... Empress!"
manjumicha2001
- 02:20am Mar 15, 2002 EST (#561
of 574)
The way I look at it, this forum can get really boring without
Louis M. He provides a wonderful prototypical model of American
white male that you all need to win over re: the technical merits of
NMD. So far you are all over-educated pinkos to him, not worth
paying attention to...
If you lose him, forget about the rest....they ain't gonna buy
your story either. The first order of business for RSHOW is to speak
more plain language to Louis Ms of this world. I doubt he is really
reading all your long-winded philosopical postings. If he ain't
reading them, most American public won't get it either.
manjumicha2001
- 02:28am Mar 15, 2002 EST (#562
of 574)
And Louis M, Rshow never claimed that the previous tests did not
have balloons. They all carried decoys too but it is just that those
were specially prepared and illuminated to be differentiated from
the warhead by the software system guiding the kill vehicle, thereby
making it sure that decoys would not distract teh kill vehicle from
homing into the warhead.
Hope this clarifies. Btw, I wonder how they are ever gonna write
a software (assuming that it is even theoretically possible) that
can home in on the "wobbling" NK missiles.....maybe rshow's
collegues are busy working on the mysteries of chaos theory and
predict how random wobble of a bullet can be predicted and
intercepted.....or maybe Rouis M can enlighten us on that
issue.....:-)
lchic
- 09:45am Mar 15, 2002 EST (#563
of 574)
ManJ ... look at the evidence :
mazza9 - 10:14pm Mar 14, 2002 EST (#554 of 562) Louis Mazza
Are you suggesting that my "phylosophy" {sic} is not nuanced?
You are trying to say that mAzzA doesn't read ... yet note
he 'writes' as a professional journalist!
He 'pretends' not to read ... pretends not to remember various
facts ... pretends to be variously this and that ... he rarely
'contributes' ... he doesn't 'work' for the thread - yet doesn't go
away ...
One takes it that ManJ and mAzzA 'know' each other .. why else
would ManJ make the 'American White Male' reference ...
So much for diversion ...
manjumicha2001
- 09:49am Mar 15, 2002 EST (#564
of 574)
lchic
it is called an insight.
btw, you got to relax a bit. paranioa doesn't really contribute
to your cause either
rshow55
- 09:58am Mar 15, 2002 EST (#565
of 574)
but a little mononoia, from time to time . .
manj, I appreciated your insight.
Could it be that some people are trying to resolve some problems?
That might not be too hard, actually.
(9
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|