New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(11811 previous messages)
rshow55
- 05:57pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11812
of 11827)
For the MI complex -- the more that his spent, the better. So a
238 billion dollar program -- hidden away from Congressional
oversight -- can only be "good."
Neither ordinary American citizens, nor people in other
countries, can reasonably agree. Especially when the economic
interests distort foreign policy -- and foreign policy doctrine.
For example, does the United States as a nation reasonably need a
doctrine of "undeterrable rogues"? Wouldn't it be of more use to
make deterrance effective, rather than give up on it?
For the United States as a nation -- the answer is yes -- and the
arguments in favor of credible deterrance remain very powerful.
But though the argument of "undeterrable rogues" may make no
sense to ordinary Americans, or to any of our allies -- it is tailor
made to fit the interests of the contractors who want to keep
working on MD projects. And the doctrine arose "on demand" to
justify those projects.
We need to be clear about what is in the true national interest
-- and other countries in the world have a right to ask us to be
clear.
lchic
- 05:59pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11813
of 11827)
Showalter - that was a significant absense from the board
(timewise) ... i was beginning to wonder if you'd been tripped by a
Vampire .. did you have problems putting 'truth' on the board?
lchic
- 06:02pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11814
of 11827)
!
rshow55
- 06:05pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11815
of 11827)
By Eisenhower's time, the MI complex - - and especially the part
that was involved in nuclear matters -- was barely under
presidential and congressional control -- and controls have become
worse since.
When America's policies seem bloodthirsty and irrational -- and
when we can't get even our closes allies to understand them -- one
may call these policies irrational -- but it may be especially
important to ask irrational for whom?
The situation we're in is not only a mess -- it is a
strange mess . The Cold War never got wound done in a
responsible, planned fashion -- and things are way out of control.
The "rationales" involved often have to be hidden, because they are
so muddled, and/or corrupt.
We need to have questions asked -- facts are very important. And
technical facts about the feasibility of MD are good to start with
-- because the technical imperatives are so clear -- and the
administration responses so "irrational" if it is the interest of
the United States that are being served.
lchic
- 06:06pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11816
of 11827)
wound done
Nope it never did get wound down ..
rshow55
- 06:06pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11817
of 11827)
Had some machine problems. Don't know why.
lchic
- 06:09pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11818
of 11827)
It's still winding up .. with Dollars turning that - clockwork
spring - key !
Like they say Money is the root of all Evil and it truth
were known, and Bushy wants truth .. perhaps there's a lot of EVIL
in that still unwound coil.
lchic
- 06:11pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11819
of 11827)
Don't know why?
A search on this thread will show you mentioning, and often, that
your computer has been 'under attack'.
Seems there's a faction who don't want 'truth out'!
lchic
- 06:13pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11820
of 11827)
Missile Defense #1241 - rshowalter Mar 21, 2001 01:42 pm I
missed your point - and posted not having read it. Pardon me. My
computer is under so much attack that I disconnect my modem cable,
usually, when I'm not actually transmitting...
rshow55
- 06:15pm Feb 25, 2002 EST (#11821
of 11827)
Could be. Interruptions that actually shut me down, in the past,
have often seemed nonrandom events.
(6
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|