New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
(10738 previous messages)
idenbade
- 09:10pm Jan 12, 2002 EST (#10739
of 10755)
And some people like lchic think Bush and Enron are together like
flint! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Those in glass houses should not throw stones! That means you
Dems! HAHAHAHAHAHA
From the AP:
"Don't expect certain Democrats to be too eager to investigate
Enron. They won't like what will come out about Bill Clinton and his
favorite illegal campaign donor, China.
Here's a fascinating item from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review's
"Dateline D.C." from Dec. 9, headlined "Clinton-Gore sales team
eased Enron's path to success." We might have overlooked it if not
for an alert from Progressive Review's Sam Smith, that rare
honorable leftist who has never flinched from examining Clinton's
reign of corruption.
"The so-called 'popular press,' in its usual searches for the
clay feet with which they invest every well-known person, will now
try to link Enron's present woes to the White House. Too bad, guys,
you should have started investigating Enron's ties (ties not links)
in 1993 and onward to the sales team of Bill Clinton, Al Gore and
Ron Brown," says the Tribune-Review.
And this: "... look at their 1994 sales team - Clinton, Gore and
the late Ron Brown - a trio unlimited and uncontrolled in their
cunning and greed.
"In what seems to be eons ago, before Gov. Bill Clinton became
president, the late, much loved and little lamented Ron Brown was
Clinton's good friend and a power broker in the National Democratic
Party. Ron Brown had a friend, a congressman from Houston, the late
Mickey Leland, who died in 1989. Until his passing, Leland was a
shining light in the Congressional Black Caucus and a dedicated
socialist, who was one of the Institute for Policy Studies'
delights.
"From 1984, when Enron was conceived, Brown and Leland were there
snapping up unconsidered trifles of money for use in their campaigns
against the free market. Mickey was able to ease a lot of Enron's
early problems through the Houston City Council by playing his
'equal opportunity card.' He had also become an African expert who
initially took the Enron message to that continent, a chore that was
taken on by Ron Brown, Clinton's secretary of commerce, before the
latter met his untimely death in a highly controversial plane crash
in Croatia. (Untimely, because had Secretary Brown lived, he would
have faced multiple criminal indictments that could have
precipitated an even earlier fall for Bill Clinton and his gang.)
"Now we get to that old puzzle about chickens and eggs, and what
came first! Ron Brown, Al Gore and Bill Clinton introduced Enron to
market managers in Russia, China, Indonesia and India. In
rshow55
- 09:19pm Jan 12, 2002 EST (#10740
of 10755)
From MD10439 RobertShowalter
"Missile Defense" 12/19/01 7:00am MD10440 RobertShowalter
"Missile Defense" 12/19/01 7:08am
"In the Enron disaster, some people knowingly (or
at least half knowingly) pushed the limits of honesty and public
spirited conduct (to say no more) overclaiming, overcharging,
hiding detail, and setting up a situation which, because of
quantitative misjudgements, great damage was done, not only to
those immediately involved, but to the web of trust, the web of
assumptions, on which our society is built, and on which free
societies must be built. Some of what was done may have involved
political corruption by most reasonable definitions - perhaps not,
but there was that appearance.
"Very many more people, employees of Enron, as
well as investors, were swept along - - did trust - - did
participate on bases which are normal, and expected. These people
got hurt - sometimes terribly hurt.
There are analogous problems at the level of human function,
accounting, and technical checking all through our "missile defense"
programs - - some close analogies.
rshow55
- 09:46pm Jan 12, 2002 EST (#10741
of 10755)
Facts matter. These issues have been evaded by the
administration, which, unless I err, has been much involved,
directly or through paid proxies, with this forum, for a long time.
MD10721 rshow55
1/10/02 10:16am ... MD10722 rshow55
1/10/02 10:21am MD10723 rshow55
1/10/02 10:26am .... MD10724 rshow55
1/10/02 10:27am
* * * * * *
I carry no brief for the Clinton administration. This posting was
at the close of an interesting, full day of dialog with a person I
believe had some influence with that administration. MD 304 rshowalt
9/25/00 5:28pm
lchic
- 03:55am Jan 13, 2002 EST (#10742
of 10755)
Don't presume on my behalf Tripe-Fool! idenbade
1/12/02 9:10pm
lchic
- 05:14am Jan 13, 2002 EST (#10743
of 10755)
An Almarst prophecy: anothr
"The Media and the War-- Moderated" 1/12/02 6:14pm
(12 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|